Inspector Of Police Tiruvannamalai East Ps vs Dharvis And 3 Others Dhanasekar Surya And Mubarak Basha And Amina — 121/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294b,307,302,34,352,506(ii). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNTM010024422024

Trial

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

19-10-2023

Filing Number

1945/2024

Filing Date

19-10-2023

Registration No

121/2024

Registration Date

04-10-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

12-Additional District Judge

FIR Details

FIR Number

243

Police Station

Tiruvannamalai East Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,294b,307,302,34,352,506(ii)
Mp/8/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Inspector Of Police Tiruvannamalai East Ps
Mp/9/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Inspector Of Police Tiruvannamalai East Ps

Petitioner(s)

Inspector Of Police Tiruvannamalai East Ps (Police Station)

Adv. Inspector of Police Tiruvannamalai East Police Station

Respondent(s)

Dharvis And 3 Others Dhanasekar Surya And Mubarak Basha And Amina

Mubarak Basha

Dhanasekar Suriya

Amina

Hearing History

Judge: 12-Additional District Judge

13-03-2026

Trial

13-02-2026

Trial

02-01-2026

Trial

20-11-2025

Framing of Charges

17-10-2025

Framing of Charges

Interim Orders

25-04-2025
Bail order

Case Summary: Dhanasekar Surya's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS was dismissed on April 25, 2025. The court found no prima facie case for bail considering the petitioner's bad antecedents, four previous criminal cases, pattern of absconding after committal (resulting in a Non-Bailable Warrant), and likelihood of further absconding. The court rejected his claims of innocence and permanent residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Dhanasekar Surya's bail petition under Section 483 BNSS was dismissed on April 25, 2025. The court found no prima facie case for bail considering the petitioner's bad antecedents, four previous criminal cases, pattern of absconding after committal (resulting in a Non-Bailable Warrant), and likelihood of further absconding. The court rejected his claims of innocence and permanent residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case