Vijayakumar vs Jayakumar a Partnership firm Rep by Partner K Jayakumar Rep by Power Agent G Muthu — 12/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--Made Over on 19th February 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNTM010024372025

e-Filing Number

13-06-2025

Filing Number

2008/2025

Filing Date

16-Jun-2025

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

19-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Made Over

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijayakumar

    Adv. A AZARUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jayakumar a Partnership firm Rep by Partner K Jayakumar Rep by Power Agent G Muthu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Feb-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    Crl. M.P OrderView PDF

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Crl. M.P OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, granted interim suspension of Vijayakumar's sentence pending his criminal appeal. Vijayakumar was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to 6 months simple imprisonment plus Rs.2,00,000 compensation. The court suspended the sentence until 13.03.2026 on condition that he execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and appear before the court on all appeal hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, granted interim suspension of Vijayakumar's sentence pending his criminal appeal. Vijayakumar was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to 6 months simple imprisonment plus Rs.2,00,000 compensation. The court suspended the sentence until 13.03.2026 on condition that he execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and appear before the court on all appeal hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case