DHANALAKSHMI vs MANOKAR — 185/2023
Case under Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 Section 166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTM010012442023
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
371/2023
Filing Date
22-04-2013
Registration No
185/2023
Registration Date
07-06-2013
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
12-Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHANALAKSHMI
Adv. A.J.VIJAYANAND, D.KRISHNARAJ
Respondent(s)
MANOKAR
UNITED INDI INS. COM. LTD.,
Adv. K.VARADHARAJAN
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY, VELLORE
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Additional District Judge
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 24-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 10-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 21-01-2026 | Enquiry |
| 18-12-2025 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of witness (PW2) recorded in MCOP cases 179/2023 and 185/2023 before the Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai on 24.02.2026. The witness, Thanalakshmi (wife of Ranganathan), affirmed under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873 that her written statement is true and the signature is hers. The deposition was taken in open court and acknowledged as correct by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition of witness (PW2) recorded in MCOP cases 179/2023 and 185/2023 before the Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai on 24.02.2026. The witness, Thanalakshmi (wife of Ranganathan), affirmed under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873 that her written statement is true and the signature is hers. The deposition was taken in open court and acknowledged as correct by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts