Ravikumar vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DUSI POLICE STATION — 630/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTM010010492026

e-Filing Number

22-03-2026

Filing Number

742/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

630/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

57

Police Station

Dusi Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ravikumar

    Adv. A AZARUDDIN

  2. 2.Ashokkkumar

    Adv. A AZARUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DUSI POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Bail orderView PDF

    Case 630/2026 Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Ravikumar and Ashokkumar in a case involving alleged abuse, assault, and threats (Cr.No.57/2026, Dusi Police Station). The court considered that the jewel-related dispute dated back 10 years, the injured person was discharged from hospital, material investigation was substantially complete, and prosecution raised no strong objections. The accused were ordered to execute bonds of Rs.10,000 each with sureties, report daily to the Judicial Magistrate for 15 days, refrain from witness tampering, and cooperate with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 630/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 630/2026 Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Ravikumar and Ashokkumar in a case involving alleged abuse, assault, and threats (Cr.No.57/2026, Dusi Police Station). The court considered that the jewel-related dispute dated back 10 years, the injured person was discharged from hospital, material investigation was substantially complete, and prosecution raised no strong objections. The accused were ordered to execute bonds of Rs.10,000 each with sureties, report daily to the Judicial Magistrate for 15 days, refrain from witness tampering, and cooperate with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case