Lakshmi vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANIPADI POLICE STATION — 629/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 01st April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTM010010482026
e-Filing Number
22-03-2026
Filing Number
741/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
629/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
Thanipadi Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lakshmi
Adv. A AZARUDDIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANIPADI POLICE STATION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Bail orderView PDF
Summary of Case 629/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, granted anticipatory bail to Lakshmi, accused of abusing a complainant in filthy language, dragging her saree, and threatening her in a dispute over a pathway. The court found the dispute stemmed from previous enmity and noted material investigation completion, allowing bail on conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting to the magistrate for 15 days, non-tampering with witnesses, and travel restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 629/2026
Summary of Case 629/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, granted anticipatory bail to Lakshmi, accused of abusing a complainant in filthy language, dragging her saree, and threatening her in a dispute over a pathway. The court found the dispute stemmed from previous enmity and noted material investigation completion, allowing bail on conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting to the magistrate for 15 days, non-tampering with witnesses, and travel restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts