KARTHIK vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANIPADI POLICE STATION — 621/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),75(1),351(3), 79. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTM010010422026

Filing Number

735/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

621/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

Thanipadi Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),75(1),351(3), 79
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARTHIK

    Adv. THIRU.A.AZARUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANIPADI POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Bail orderView PDF

    Summary of Case 621/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai granted bail to Karthik, 27, accused of abusing a woman in filthy language, dragging her saree, and threatening her over a pathway dispute. The court allowed the bail petition considering his 6-day incarceration, completion of material investigation portions, and absence of strong objections, imposing conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 621/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 621/2026 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai granted bail to Karthik, 27, accused of abusing a woman in filthy language, dragging her saree, and threatening her over a pathway dispute. The court allowed the bail petition considering his 6-day incarceration, completion of material investigation portions, and absence of strong objections, imposing conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case