Chennan vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANIPADI POLICE STATION — 570/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTM010009622026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

676/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

570/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Thanipadi Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

1.Chennan

Adv. Ilavarasan
2.Elumalai

Adv. Ilavarasan
3.Roja

Adv. Ilavarasan
4.Murugammal

Adv. Ilavarasan

Respondent(s)

1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANIPADI POLICE STATION

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
13-Mar-2026

Bail orderView PDF

Summary of Case 570/2026: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Chennan, Elumalai, Roja, and Murugammal) accused of unlawful assembly, rioting with deadly weapons, abuse, and assault in a dispute over fetching water from a common well. The court found the dispute arose during a pending civil suit between family members, noted the injured party's hospital discharge, and the near-completion of investigation, thereby allowing bail with conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each, daily reporting to the Judicial Magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
13-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District & Sessions Judge
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 570/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 570/2026: The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Chennan, Elumalai, Roja, and Murugammal) accused of unlawful assembly, rioting with deadly weapons, abuse, and assault in a dispute over fetching water from a common well. The court found the dispute arose during a pending civil suit between family members, noted the injured party's hospital discharge, and the near-completion of investigation, thereby allowing bail with conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each, daily reporting to the Judicial Magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.