SHANMUGAM vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUVANNAMALAI PEW POLICE STATION — 565/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTM010009572026

Filing Number

671/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

565/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

Tiruvannamalai PEW Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123
Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(C),20(b)(ii)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANMUGAM

    Adv. THIRU. S.L. BABU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUVANNAMALAI PEW POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Bail orderView PDF

    Case Summary: 565/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, dismissed Shanmugam's bail petition on March 13, 2026. Shanmugam was arrested for possession of 10 grams of cannabis under sections 123 BNS and NDPS Act provisions. The court rejected bail despite the accused's claims of false implication and permanent residence, citing incomplete investigation, the nature of the drug offense, and the prosecution's strong objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 565/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 565/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, dismissed Shanmugam's bail petition on March 13, 2026. Shanmugam was arrested for possession of 10 grams of cannabis under sections 123 BNS and NDPS Act provisions. The court rejected bail despite the accused's claims of false implication and permanent residence, citing incomplete investigation, the nature of the drug offense, and the prosecution's strong objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case