DHANAKOTTE vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ADHAMANGALAMPUDHUR POLICE STATION — 564/2026

Case under Arms Act, 1959 Section 25(1)(A), 25(1)(B). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTM010009552026

Filing Number

669/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

564/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

ADHAMANGALMPUTHUR POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Arms Act, 1959 Section 25(1)(A), 25(1)(B)
Tn Forest Act, 1882 Section 35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHANAKOTTE

    Adv. THIRU.N. EZHILMARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ADHAMANGALAMPUDHUR POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Bail orderView PDF

    Case Summary: 564/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, dismissed Dhanakotte's bail petition on March 13, 2026. Dhanakotte was accused of possessing an unlicensed country-made gun and using it for hunting wildlife in a reserved forest, violating the Arms Act 1959 and Tamil Nadu Forest Act 1882. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offences, incomplete investigation, and strong prosecution opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 564/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 564/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, dismissed Dhanakotte's bail petition on March 13, 2026. Dhanakotte was accused of possessing an unlicensed country-made gun and using it for hunting wildlife in a reserved forest, violating the Arms Act 1959 and Tamil Nadu Forest Act 1882. The court denied bail citing the serious nature of the offences, incomplete investigation, and strong prosecution opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case