SENTHILKUMAR vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARNI TALUK POLICE STATION — 536/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 275,123,62. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTM010009162026

Filing Number

635/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

536/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 09-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

101

Police Station

Arni Taluk Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 275,123,62
Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 24(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SENTHILKUMAR

    Adv. THIRU.A.AZARUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARNI TALUK POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Bail orderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai granted bail to Senthilkumar, aged 47, accused of tobacco possession offences under BNS sections 123, 275, 62 and COTPA Act section 24(1). The court considered his 10-day incarceration, first-time offender status, completed investigation, and absence of prior cases to approve the bail petition. He was ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, report daily to the Judicial Magistrate for 15 days, and comply with conditions prohibiting witness tampering and unauthorized travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 536/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai granted bail to Senthilkumar, aged 47, accused of tobacco possession offences under BNS sections 123, 275, 62 and COTPA Act section 24(1). The court considered his 10-day incarceration, first-time offender status, completed investigation, and absence of prior cases to approve the bail petition. He was ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, report daily to the Judicial Magistrate for 15 days, and comply with conditions prohibiting witness tampering and unauthorized travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case