SENTHILKUMAR vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARNI TALUK POLICE STATION — 536/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 275,123,62. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTM010009162026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
635/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
536/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
101
Police Station
Arni Taluk Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SENTHILKUMAR
Adv. THIRU.A.AZARUDDIN
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARNI TALUK POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Disposed
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Await Reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai granted bail to Senthilkumar, aged 47, accused of tobacco possession offences under BNS sections 123, 275, 62 and COTPA Act section 24(1). The court considered his 10-day incarceration, first-time offender status, completed investigation, and absence of prior cases to approve the bail petition. He was ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, report daily to the Judicial Magistrate for 15 days, and comply with conditions prohibiting witness tampering and unauthorized travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai granted bail to Senthilkumar, aged 47, accused of tobacco possession offences under BNS sections 123, 275, 62 and COTPA Act section 24(1). The court considered his 10-day incarceration, first-time offender status, completed investigation, and absence of prior cases to approve the bail petition. He was ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, report daily to the Judicial Magistrate for 15 days, and comply with conditions prohibiting witness tampering and unauthorized travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts