Pandiyan vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VERAIYUR POLICE STATION — 537/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTM010009122026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
631/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
537/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
Veraiyur Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandiyan
Adv. THIRU A K THILAK
JAYAKODI
Adv. THIRU A K THILAK
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VERAIYUR POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Await Reports
Restored
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 10-03-2026 | Restored | |
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Tiruvannamalai Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Pandiyan and Jayakodi, accused of abusing, assaulting, and threatening a complainant under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 74, and 351(2). The court found the injuries minor (complainant discharged next day), investigation substantially complete, and granted bail with conditions: Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting to magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering or leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Tiruvannamalai Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Pandiyan and Jayakodi, accused of abusing, assaulting, and threatening a complainant under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 74, and 351(2). The court found the injuries minor (complainant discharged next day), investigation substantially complete, and granted bail with conditions: Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting to magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering or leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts