Chiranjeevi vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADALADI POLICE STATION — 518/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTM010008812026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

610/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

518/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 09-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

51

Police Station

Kadaladi Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chiranjeevi

    Adv. A AZARUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADALADI POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail orderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge of Tiruvannamalai granted anticipatory bail to 19-year-old Chiranjeevi in a case involving alleged offenses of abusing and threatening a temple complainant. The court allowed the petition considering the nature of the dispute (unauthorized temple entry beyond permitted hours), completion of the investigation's material portion, co-accused's prior bail release, and absence of strong prosecution objections, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond, daily reporting to the magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 518/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge of Tiruvannamalai granted anticipatory bail to 19-year-old Chiranjeevi in a case involving alleged offenses of abusing and threatening a temple complainant. The court allowed the petition considering the nature of the dispute (unauthorized temple entry beyond permitted hours), completion of the investigation's material portion, co-accused's prior bail release, and absence of strong prosecution objections, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond, daily reporting to the magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case