DINESH vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BRAMMADESAM POLICE STATION — 515/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),326(a). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTM010008772026
Filing Number
607/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
515/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
17
Police Station
Brammadesam Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DINESH
Adv. R.KANISHKAR
PARTHIBAN
GUNASEKARAN
BABU
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BRAMMADESAM POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Disposed
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Await Reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai granted bail to Dinesh, Parthiban, Gunasekaran, and Babu in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 515/2026, who were accused of illegally transporting sand without valid permission under Sections 303(2), 326(a) BNS and Section 21(5) M.M. Act. The court allowed the bail petition considering they were first-time offenders, had spent 9 days in judicial custody, investigation was substantially complete, and there were no strong objections, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting to the Judicial Magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai granted bail to Dinesh, Parthiban, Gunasekaran, and Babu in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 515/2026, who were accused of illegally transporting sand without valid permission under Sections 303(2), 326(a) BNS and Section 21(5) M.M. Act. The court allowed the bail petition considering they were first-time offenders, had spent 9 days in judicial custody, investigation was substantially complete, and there were no strong objections, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting to the Judicial Magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and leaving the jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts