Vijaykanth alias Vijayagandha vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADALADI POLICE STATION — 509/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTM010008622026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

597/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

509/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijaykanth alias Vijayagandha

    Adv. A AZARUDDIN

  2. 2.Mallikarjunan

    Adv. A AZARUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADALADI POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Bail orderView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition for the 1st petitioner (Vijaykanth) but granted anticipatory bail to the 2nd petitioner (Mallikarjunan) for alleged offences under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court considered the land dispute, completion of material investigation, and the injured person's hospital discharge as grounds for bail, subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 509/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition for the 1st petitioner (Vijaykanth) but granted anticipatory bail to the 2nd petitioner (Mallikarjunan) for alleged offences under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court considered the land dispute, completion of material investigation, and the injured person's hospital discharge as grounds for bail, subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case