Vijaykanth alias Vijayagandha vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADALADI POLICE STATION — 509/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 06th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTM010008622026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
597/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
509/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijaykanth alias Vijayagandha
Adv. A AZARUDDIN
Mallikarjunan
Adv. A AZARUDDIN
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADALADI POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Disposed
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Await Reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition for the 1st petitioner (Vijaykanth) but granted anticipatory bail to the 2nd petitioner (Mallikarjunan) for alleged offences under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court considered the land dispute, completion of material investigation, and the injured person's hospital discharge as grounds for bail, subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai dismissed the anticipatory bail petition for the 1st petitioner (Vijaykanth) but granted anticipatory bail to the 2nd petitioner (Mallikarjunan) for alleged offences under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3). The court considered the land dispute, completion of material investigation, and the injured person's hospital discharge as grounds for bail, subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts