Prakash vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VANDAVASI NORTH POLICE STATION — 465/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTM010007922026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
543/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
465/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
Vandavasi North Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prakash
Adv. Anbazhagan Manickam
Vasu alias Vasudevan
Adv. Anbazhagan Manickam
Vinoth
Adv. Anbazhagan Manickam
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VANDAVASI NORTH POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Disposed
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Await Reports | |
| 27-02-2026 | Await Reports |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Tiruvannamalai Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged with abusive language, assault, and threats under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), and 118(1). The court found the dispute trivial, noted the injured person's hospital discharge, and completion of material investigation, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting to the magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Tiruvannamalai Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged with abusive language, assault, and threats under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), and 118(1). The court found the dispute trivial, noted the injured person's hospital discharge, and completion of material investigation, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting to the magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts