Prakash vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VANDAVASI NORTH POLICE STATION — 465/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTM010007922026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

543/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

465/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 09-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Vandavasi North Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

1.Prakash

Adv. Anbazhagan Manickam
2.Vasu alias Vasudevan

Adv. Anbazhagan Manickam
3.Vinoth

Adv. Anbazhagan Manickam

Respondent(s)

1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VANDAVASI NORTH POLICE STATION

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
10-Mar-2026

Bail orderView PDF

Summary The Tiruvannamalai Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged with abusive language, assault, and threats under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), and 118(1). The court found the dispute trivial, noted the injured person's hospital discharge, and completion of material investigation, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting to the magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
10-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District & Sessions Judge
07-Mar-2026

Await Reports

Principal District & Sessions Judge
27-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
25-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 465/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Tiruvannamalai Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons charged with abusive language, assault, and threats under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), and 118(1). The court found the dispute trivial, noted the injured person's hospital discharge, and completion of material investigation, imposing conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting to the magistrate for 15 days, and restrictions on witness tampering and travel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.