GNANAPRIYANKA vs RAMALINGAM — 33/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1S26. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM010005232024

Trial

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

107/2024

Filing Date

05-02-2024

Registration No

33/2024

Registration Date

05-02-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

12-Additional District Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7R1S26
COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 22
IA/2/2025 Classification : Others Section RAMALINGAMGNANAPRIYANKA
IA/3/2025 Classification : Others Section RAMALINGAMGNANAPRIYANKA
IA/5/2026 Classification : Others Section RAMALINGAMGNANAPRIYANKA

Petitioner(s)

GNANAPRIYANKA

Adv. THIRU. D. ANBALAGAN

Respondent(s)

RAMALINGAM

Hearing History

Judge: 12-Additional District Judge

10-03-2026

Trial

28-01-2026

Issues

17-12-2025

Issues

19-11-2025

Issues

27-10-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

25-03-2025
Fair Order
25-03-2025
Fair Order
25-03-2025
Fair Order
25-03-2025
Fair Order

PETITION ALLOWED - ATTACHMENT BEFORE JUDGMENT GRANTED The Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai, allowed the petitioner's petition for attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC. The petitioner sought to attach the respondent's properties (valued at Rs. 68,82,000) as security for a debt recovery suit of Rs. 28,68,630 based on a promissory note dated 11.06.2022, finding that the respondent was attempting to alienate the properties to defeat the petitioner's interests. The court directed the petitioner to commence trial without delay, failing which the attachment order would be withdrawn, with attachment to be completed by 25.04.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

PETITION ALLOWED - ATTACHMENT BEFORE JUDGMENT GRANTED The Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai, allowed the petitioner's petition for attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC. The petitioner sought to attach the respondent's properties (valued at Rs. 68,82,000) as security for a debt recovery suit of Rs. 28,68,630 based on a promissory note dated 11.06.2022, finding that the respondent was attempting to alienate the properties to defeat the petitioner's interests. The court directed the petitioner to commence trial without delay, failing which the attachment order would be withdrawn, with attachment to be completed by 25.04.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case