INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUVANNAMALAI TALUK PS vs MURUGAN AND 16 OTHERS — 37/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,341,435,307,302. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTM010001852019
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
164/2019
Filing Date
22-01-2019
Registration No
37/2019
Registration Date
22-01-2019
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
12-Additional District Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
241
Police Station
Tiruvannamalai Taluk Police Station
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUVANNAMALAI TALUK PS (Police Station)
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
MURUGAN AND 16 OTHERS
PARTHIBAN
PANEERSELVAM
KAMARAJ
PATTUSAMY
ELUMALAI
RAVI
RAMESH
ELUMALAI
MANI
PARAMASIVAM
SAMPATH
SELVAM
VISWANATHAN
RAMACHANDIRAN
MANI
KALIDASS
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Additional District Judge
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-01-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-12-2025 | Part Heard |
| 06-11-2025 | Part Heard |
| 16-10-2025 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of witness (PW10) in S.C. No. 37/2019 before the Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai. The witness testified about an incident on 01.05.2013 involving alleged criminal conspiracy by the named accused to block a national highway and set fire to a vehicle (HR 55 N 6976). The petition under Section 317 CrPC (for exempting witness from personal attendance) was allowed, with some accused present and others absent during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition of witness (PW10) in S.C. No. 37/2019 before the Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai. The witness testified about an incident on 01.05.2013 involving alleged criminal conspiracy by the named accused to block a national highway and set fire to a vehicle (HR 55 N 6976). The petition under Section 317 CrPC (for exempting witness from personal attendance) was allowed, with some accused present and others absent during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts