Indian Overseas Bank, Kalakadu Branch through its Branch Manager vs C.Udhayabharathi — 50/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or21R37,38. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNTL270008462020
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
424/2020
Filing Date
18-07-2019
Registration No
50/2020
Registration Date
18-07-2019
Court
Sub Court, Nanguneri
Judge
3-Sub-ordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Indian Overseas Bank, Kalakadu Branch through its Branch Manager
Adv. Thiru.R.Sankara Narayanan
Respondent(s)
C.Udhayabharathi
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Sub-ordinate Judge
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Batta
Orders
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim |
| 19-02-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim |
| 21-01-2026 | Batta |
| 20-01-2026 | Orders |
| 12-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed — The court granted the execution petition filed by Indian Overseas Bank against C. Udayabarathi to enforce a civil judgment (OS No. 206/2015 dated 26.10.2016). The court authorized the arrest and civil imprisonment of the defendant for failure to pay Rs. 3,66,220 plus 12.50% annual interest, finding that the defendant had sufficient means but willfully refused payment despite financial hardship claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed — The court granted the execution petition filed by Indian Overseas Bank against C. Udayabarathi to enforce a civil judgment (OS No. 206/2015 dated 26.10.2016). The court authorized the arrest and civil imprisonment of the defendant for failure to pay Rs. 3,66,220 plus 12.50% annual interest, finding that the defendant had sufficient means but willfully refused payment despite financial hardship claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts