Arumugam alis Selvi vs Murugesan — 60/2024

Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNTL270008032024

Filing Number

323/2024

Filing Date

18-Oct-2024

Registration No

60/2024

Registration Date

06-Nov-2024

Court

Sub Court, Nanguneri

Judge

3-Sub-ordinate Judge

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arumugam alis Selvi

    Adv. E. Seenivasan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Murugesan

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  10. 13-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  11. 11-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: HMOP 60/2024 Date: 11.11.2025 Petitioner: Arumugam alias Selvi Respondent: Murugesan This is a family dispute case involving matrimonial matters between the petitioner's daughter and the respondent (son-in-law). The petitioner testified regarding allegations of mistreatment by the respondent and his family, disputes over jewelry given at the time of the child's birth, and disagreements about the son-in-law's reluctance to live as a live-in son-in-law due to his overseas employment. The petitioner also addressed claims of verbal abuse and presented the daughter's statement regarding independent decision-making. The court conducted cross-examination of the petitioner's testimony. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 11-Nov-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  13. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  14. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  15. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  17. 07-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  19. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  20. 11-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  21. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  22. 03-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  23. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  24. 21-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  25. 08-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  26. 25-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  27. 11-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  28. 20-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  29. 03-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  30. 08-Apr-2025

    Counter

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  31. 25-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  32. 08-Jan-2025

    Batta

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  33. 06-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    Sub-ordinate Judge

  34. 06-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 18-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: HMOP 60/2024 Date: 11.11.2025 Petitioner: Arumugam alias Selvi Respondent: Murugesan This is a family dispute case involving matrimonial matters between the petitioner's daughter and the respondent (son-in-law). The petitioner testified regarding allegations of mistreatment by the respondent and his family, disputes over jewelry given at the time of the child's birth, and disagreements about the son-in-law's reluctance to live as a live-in son-in-law due to his overseas employment. The petitioner also addressed claims of verbal abuse and presented the daughter's statement regarding independent decision-making. The court conducted cross-examination of the petitioner's testimony. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case