Arumugam alis Selvi vs Murugesan — 60/2024
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNTL270008032024
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
323/2024
Filing Date
18-10-2024
Registration No
60/2024
Registration Date
06-11-2024
Court
Sub Court, Nanguneri
Judge
3-Sub-ordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arumugam alis Selvi
Adv. E. Seenivasan
Respondent(s)
Murugesan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Sub-ordinate Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: HMOP 60/2024 Date: 11.11.2025 Petitioner: Arumugam alias Selvi Respondent: Murugesan This is a family dispute case involving matrimonial matters between the petitioner's daughter and the respondent (son-in-law). The petitioner testified regarding allegations of mistreatment by the respondent and his family, disputes over jewelry given at the time of the child's birth, and disagreements about the son-in-law's reluctance to live as a live-in son-in-law due to his overseas employment. The petitioner also addressed claims of verbal abuse and presented the daughter's statement regarding independent decision-making. The court conducted cross-examination of the petitioner's testimony. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: HMOP 60/2024 Date: 11.11.2025 Petitioner: Arumugam alias Selvi Respondent: Murugesan This is a family dispute case involving matrimonial matters between the petitioner's daughter and the respondent (son-in-law). The petitioner testified regarding allegations of mistreatment by the respondent and his family, disputes over jewelry given at the time of the child's birth, and disagreements about the son-in-law's reluctance to live as a live-in son-in-law due to his overseas employment. The petitioner also addressed claims of verbal abuse and presented the daughter's statement regarding independent decision-making. The court conducted cross-examination of the petitioner's testimony. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts