Arumugam alis Selvi vs Murugesan — 60/2024

Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNTL270008032024

Evidence

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

323/2024

Filing Date

18-10-2024

Registration No

60/2024

Registration Date

06-11-2024

Court

Sub Court, Nanguneri

Judge

3-Sub-ordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13

Petitioner(s)

Arumugam alis Selvi

Adv. E. Seenivasan

Respondent(s)

Murugesan

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Sub-ordinate Judge

02-06-2026

Evidence

07-04-2026

Evidence

14-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

11-11-2025
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary: HMOP 60/2024 Date: 11.11.2025 Petitioner: Arumugam alias Selvi Respondent: Murugesan This is a family dispute case involving matrimonial matters between the petitioner's daughter and the respondent (son-in-law). The petitioner testified regarding allegations of mistreatment by the respondent and his family, disputes over jewelry given at the time of the child's birth, and disagreements about the son-in-law's reluctance to live as a live-in son-in-law due to his overseas employment. The petitioner also addressed claims of verbal abuse and presented the daughter's statement regarding independent decision-making. The court conducted cross-examination of the petitioner's testimony. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: HMOP 60/2024 Date: 11.11.2025 Petitioner: Arumugam alias Selvi Respondent: Murugesan This is a family dispute case involving matrimonial matters between the petitioner's daughter and the respondent (son-in-law). The petitioner testified regarding allegations of mistreatment by the respondent and his family, disputes over jewelry given at the time of the child's birth, and disagreements about the son-in-law's reluctance to live as a live-in son-in-law due to his overseas employment. The petitioner also addressed claims of verbal abuse and presented the daughter's statement regarding independent decision-making. The court conducted cross-examination of the petitioner's testimony. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Nanguneri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case