Samuthira Maharajan vs P.Arumugakani and 3 others — 186/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court on 18th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTL210002202022
Filing Number
215/2022
Filing Date
27-Oct-2022
Registration No
186/2022
Registration Date
31-Oct-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Nanguneri
Judge
2-District Munsif
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Samuthira Maharajan
Adv. E.Seenivasan
Respondent(s)
-
1.P.Arumugakani and 3 others
-
2.S.Muthammal
-
3.S.Murugan
-
4.P.Devi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
08-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
12-Dec-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
22-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
18-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
17-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
02-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
28-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
21-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
13-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
15-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
03-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
27-Jun-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
19-Jun-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
10-Jun-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
The court (dated 10.06.2024 in Original Case 186/2022) addressed a family dispute involving housing and marital matters between the plaintiff and the third defendant. The court found that the third defendant's claims regarding separate residence and denial of financial obligations were disputed, and rejected contentions that the case was filed maliciously, characterizing it as a family matter requiring proper adjudication rather than dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
05-Jun-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
08-Apr-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
20-Mar-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
20-Mar-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2024
Evidence
District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
09-Jan-2024
Trial
District Munsif
-
11-Dec-2023
Trial
District Munsif
-
21-Nov-2023
Trial
District Munsif
-
16-Oct-2023
Trial
District Munsif
-
22-Sep-2023
Trial
District Munsif
-
04-Sep-2023
Issues
District Munsif
-
22-Aug-2023
Amendment
District Munsif
-
31-Jul-2023
Amendment
District Munsif
-
20-Jul-2023
Amendment
District Munsif
-
06-Jul-2023
Issues
District Munsif
-
23-Jun-2023
Issues
District Munsif
-
13-Jun-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
24-Apr-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
10-Apr-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
20-Mar-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
09-Mar-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
09-Feb-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
12-Jan-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
22-Dec-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
30-Nov-2022
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
District Munsif
-
31-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 186/2022
The court (dated 10.06.2024 in Original Case 186/2022) addressed a family dispute involving housing and marital matters between the plaintiff and the third defendant. The court found that the third defendant's claims regarding separate residence and denial of financial obligations were disputed, and rejected contentions that the case was filed maliciously, characterizing it as a family matter requiring proper adjudication rather than dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts