Savarimuthu Chelladurai vs Ponsekar — 121/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25b27c. Disposed: Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court on 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTL210001392023
Filing Number
135/2023
Filing Date
03-07-2023
Registration No
121/2023
Registration Date
06-07-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Nanguneri
Judge
2-District Munsif
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Savarimuthu Chelladurai
Adv. S.Lingadurai
Respondent(s)
Ponsekar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness examination transcript from a property dispute case (Original Case No. 121/2023) dated February 12, 2026, recorded in Tamil. The witness Gnanasundaram testifies regarding a family property dispute involving water drainage issues between siblings. The witness confirms that their grandfather Savarimuththu Nicker owned the land, which was later divided among 11 children, and that their father Jacob Nicker's portion was transferred to siblings about 15 years ago, with the original title documents remaining in the father's name. The court is examining testimony regarding whether the plaintiff brother's construction encroached on the defendant's property regarding water drainage rights, with the witness denying that they provided false testimony favoring either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness examination transcript from a property dispute case (Original Case No. 121/2023) dated February 12, 2026, recorded in Tamil. The witness Gnanasundaram testifies regarding a family property dispute involving water drainage issues between siblings. The witness confirms that their grandfather Savarimuththu Nicker owned the land, which was later divided among 11 children, and that their father Jacob Nicker's portion was transferred to siblings about 15 years ago, with the original title documents remaining in the father's name. The court is examining testimony regarding whether the plaintiff brother's construction encroached on the defendant's property regarding water drainage rights, with the witness denying that they provided false testimony favoring either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts