Mani and 5 others vs The Tahsildar, Nanguneri Tk — 91/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d),27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTL210001092025
Filing Number
118/2025
Filing Date
30-Jun-2025
Registration No
91/2025
Registration Date
15-Jul-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Nanguneri
Judge
2-District Munsif
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mani and 5 others
Adv. P.Pandarasami B.A. B.L.
-
2.Panner selvam
-
3.Selvaraj
-
4.Rathinamani
-
5.Meenraj
-
6.Murugarani
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahsildar, Nanguneri Tk
-
2.Tamilnadu government Through its District Collector Tirunelveli
Case History
-
25-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
06-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
30-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Deposition of Witness (PW2) recorded in Original Suit No. O.S.91/2025 before the District Munsif Court, Nanguneri on 30.01.2026. Witness Sundharraj (age 64), testifying for the Plaintiff, affirmed his deposition in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming the accuracy of his written statement and cross-examination responses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
18-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
20-Nov-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
22-Oct-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
18-Sep-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
18-Aug-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
15-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2025
Case Summary Deposition of Witness (PW2) recorded in Original Suit No. O.S.91/2025 before the District Munsif Court, Nanguneri on 30.01.2026. Witness Sundharraj (age 64), testifying for the Plaintiff, affirmed his deposition in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming the accuracy of his written statement and cross-examination responses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts