Muthukathiravan vs Thilaiammal — 1184/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTL090051582024
e-Filing Number
26-09-2024
Filing Number
5154/2024
Filing Date
26-09-2024
Registration No
1184/2024
Registration Date
27-11-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Vallioor
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
FIR Details
Police Station
Valliyoor P.S.,
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muthukathiravan
Adv. Ramnath Iyer V
Respondent(s)
Thilaiammal
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Lok Adalat
Arguments
Arguments
Service Pending-Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-02-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-12-2025 | Service Pending-Warrant |
Interim Orders
Case 1184/2024 Summary In this witness examination proceeding before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Valliyoor, Muthukathiravan (complainant/PW1) testified on 24.10.2025 regarding his complaint against Thilaiammal. The complainant presented seven documentary exhibits including an FIR, ICICI bank receipt, written memo, lawyer's notice, postal receipt, original agreement, and respondent's Aadhaar card. The accused was absent; a petition under Section 317 CrPC was filed and allowed. Cross-examination by the accused's counsel was not prepared, and the witness examination was concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 1184/2024 Summary In this witness examination proceeding before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Valliyoor, Muthukathiravan (complainant/PW1) testified on 24.10.2025 regarding his complaint against Thilaiammal. The complainant presented seven documentary exhibits including an FIR, ICICI bank receipt, written memo, lawyer's notice, postal receipt, original agreement, and respondent's Aadhaar card. The accused was absent; a petition under Section 317 CrPC was filed and allowed. Cross-examination by the accused's counsel was not prepared, and the witness examination was concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts