Merlin Rani vs Nelson Devasahayam — 687/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Lok Adalat. Next hearing: 13th June 2026.

Lok Adalat Next hearing 13-Jun-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTL090048092023

Filing Number

4803/2023

Filing Date

18-Aug-2023

Registration No

687/2023

Registration Date

18-Aug-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vallioor

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Merlin Rani

    Adv. Thiru.V.Ramnath Iyer

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nelson Devasahayam

Case History

  1. 13-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 13-Dec-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 25-Jul-2025

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 14-Jul-2025

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 11-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 14-Jun-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 29-May-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 22-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 12-Mar-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: STC.687/2023 In this Judicial Magistrate Court case at Valliyoor, complainant Merlin Rani (age 62) filed a cheque bounce case against Nelson Devasahayam involving a ₹4,00,000 cheque dated 31.10.2022 from Canara Bank. During the witness examination hearing on 12.03.2025, the accused was absent and a petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C was filed and allowed. The witness (complainant) testified and submitted eight documentary exhibits including original bank cheques, receipts, and correspondence. Cross-examination was adjourned at the request of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 08-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 26-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 30-Sep-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 05-Sep-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 06-Jun-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 02-May-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 08-Feb-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 09-Nov-2023

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 14-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 18-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 687/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STC.687/2023 In this Judicial Magistrate Court case at Valliyoor, complainant Merlin Rani (age 62) filed a cheque bounce case against Nelson Devasahayam involving a ₹4,00,000 cheque dated 31.10.2022 from Canara Bank. During the witness examination hearing on 12.03.2025, the accused was absent and a petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C was filed and allowed. The witness (complainant) testified and submitted eight documentary exhibits including original bank cheques, receipts, and correspondence. Cross-examination was adjourned at the request of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case