Anand vs Senthil Kumar — 392/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Lok Adalat. Next hearing: 13th June 2026.

Lok Adalat Next hearing 13-Jun-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTL090020912024

e-Filing Number

25-04-2024

Filing Number

2087/2024

Filing Date

25-Apr-2024

Registration No

392/2024

Registration Date

29-Apr-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vallioor

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anand

    Adv. Ramnath Iyer V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Senthil Kumar

Case History

  1. 13-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 02-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 05-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 21-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 07-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 24-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 26-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case 392/2024 Summary: In this case dated 26.09.2025, the court recorded witness testimony (P.W.1) of petitioner Anand against respondent Senthil Kumar concerning an alleged loan dispute. The accused was absent, and a CrPC 317 petition was filed and allowed. Anand testified that he is a farmer with 2 acres of agricultural land and denied lending money to Senthil Kumar on 04.02.2024 as claimed, stating the respondent arrived with a pre-filled promissory note. Anand further testified about previous loans from 2017 and disputed the validity of various documents. The court recorded the witness testimony, which was read over and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 26-Sep-2025

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 22-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 22-Aug-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 05-Jun-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 15-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 08-Mar-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 06-Mar-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 14-Dec-2024

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 05-Dec-2024

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 03-Dec-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 28-Nov-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 29-Aug-2024

    Service Pending-Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 30-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 25-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 392/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 392/2024 Summary: In this case dated 26.09.2025, the court recorded witness testimony (P.W.1) of petitioner Anand against respondent Senthil Kumar concerning an alleged loan dispute. The accused was absent, and a CrPC 317 petition was filed and allowed. Anand testified that he is a farmer with 2 acres of agricultural land and denied lending money to Senthil Kumar on 04.02.2024 as claimed, stating the respondent arrived with a pre-filled promissory note. Anand further testified about previous loans from 2017 and disputed the validity of various documents. The court recorded the witness testimony, which was read over and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case