Anand vs Senthil Kumar — 392/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Lok Adalat. Next hearing: 13th June 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTL090020912024
Next Hearing
13th June 2026
e-Filing Number
25-04-2024
Filing Number
2087/2024
Filing Date
25-04-2024
Registration No
392/2024
Registration Date
29-04-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Vallioor
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anand
Adv. Ramnath Iyer V
Respondent(s)
Senthil Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate
Lok Adalat
For further Proceedings
Lok Adalat
Lok Adalat
Lok Adalat
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 10-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 27-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 14-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 26-02-2026 | Lok Adalat |
Interim Orders
Case 392/2024 Summary: In this case dated 26.09.2025, the court recorded witness testimony (P.W.1) of petitioner Anand against respondent Senthil Kumar concerning an alleged loan dispute. The accused was absent, and a CrPC 317 petition was filed and allowed. Anand testified that he is a farmer with 2 acres of agricultural land and denied lending money to Senthil Kumar on 04.02.2024 as claimed, stating the respondent arrived with a pre-filled promissory note. Anand further testified about previous loans from 2017 and disputed the validity of various documents. The court recorded the witness testimony, which was read over and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 392/2024 Summary: In this case dated 26.09.2025, the court recorded witness testimony (P.W.1) of petitioner Anand against respondent Senthil Kumar concerning an alleged loan dispute. The accused was absent, and a CrPC 317 petition was filed and allowed. Anand testified that he is a farmer with 2 acres of agricultural land and denied lending money to Senthil Kumar on 04.02.2024 as claimed, stating the respondent arrived with a pre-filled promissory note. Anand further testified about previous loans from 2017 and disputed the validity of various documents. The court recorded the witness testimony, which was read over and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts