Soosai Mariya Jemila vs Josheb Ashir — 400015/2018
Case under Protectionofwomenfromdomesticviolenceact Section 12. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
DVC - Domestic Violence Case
CNR: TNTL090005592018
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
400200/2018
Filing Date
14-08-2018
Registration No
400015/2018
Registration Date
14-08-2018
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Vallioor
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Soosai Mariya Jemila
Adv. Thiru. S. Raja
Respondent(s)
Josheb Ashir
Anthony Belson
Paniyarasi
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Lok Adalat
Restored
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 17-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 06-02-2026 | Restored |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 400015/2018 Petition Partially Allowed The Magistrate's Court at Valliyur partially allowed Soosai Mariya Jemila's petition against Josheb Ashir, Anthony Belson, and Paniyarasi under the Domestic Violence Act. The court issued a protective order prohibiting domestic violence, ordered the first respondent to pay ₹25,000 as advance rent and ₹3,000 monthly maintenance for the petitioner and her two children, directed monthly subsistence allowance of ₹15,000, and mandated repayment of ₹2,00,000 borrowed money. The property encumbrance claim was rejected, and prosecution under DV Act Section 31 was threatened for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 400015/2018 Petition Partially Allowed The Magistrate's Court at Valliyur partially allowed Soosai Mariya Jemila's petition against Josheb Ashir, Anthony Belson, and Paniyarasi under the Domestic Violence Act. The court issued a protective order prohibiting domestic violence, ordered the first respondent to pay ₹25,000 as advance rent and ₹3,000 monthly maintenance for the petitioner and her two children, directed monthly subsistence allowance of ₹15,000, and mandated repayment of ₹2,00,000 borrowed money. The property encumbrance claim was rejected, and prosecution under DV Act Section 31 was threatened for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts