Antony Michael @ Antony vs Lurdhu Nadhan Advocate - Thiru.M. Gregory Retna Raj — 83/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTL080008652023
Filing Number
99/2023
Filing Date
18-Jul-2023
Registration No
83/2023
Registration Date
18-Jul-2023
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Antony Michael @ Antony
Adv. Thiru.S. Subash
Respondent(s)
-
1.Lurdhu Nadhan Advocate - Thiru.M. Gregory Retna Raj
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Arguments
Principal District Munsif
-
27-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District Munsif
-
06-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District Munsif
-
14-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
06-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
Principal District Munsif
-
20-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case 83/2023 Summary Court: Primary District Civil Court, Valliyur Date: 20.02.2026 Petitioner: Antony Michael Respondent: Lurdhu Nadhan Advocate & M. Gregory Retna Raj This civil dispute concerns a 1 acre 27 cent agricultural property in Tandayaar village leased for poultry farming since 2017. The witness (respondent) testified that he received monthly rent of Rs. 7,500 deposited in his bank account until the petition was filed; rent payments were made regularly even during the pandemic. He denied the petitioner's claims of arrears and stated the property remains vacant pending court proceedings. The court's examination confirmed the lease arrangement and rent payment history through documentary evidence, with the respondent's testimony corroborating the lease terms and continuous rent remittance until the litigation commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
09-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
02-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
03-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
22-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
08-Aug-2025
Mediation
Principal District Munsif
-
14-Jul-2025
Mediation
Principal District Munsif
-
12-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-Jul-2025
Mediation
Principal District Munsif
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
10-Jun-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
02-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
22-Apr-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Munsif
-
27-Mar-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
01-Mar-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
10-Feb-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
19-Dec-2024
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
23-Oct-2024
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
05-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
22-Jul-2024
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
11-Jun-2024
Issues
Principal District Munsif
-
21-Mar-2024
Issues
Principal District Munsif
-
19-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
10-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
04-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
18-Oct-2023
Issues
Principal District Munsif
-
18-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
17-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Munsif
-
18-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 83/2023
Case 83/2023 Summary Court: Primary District Civil Court, Valliyur Date: 20.02.2026 Petitioner: Antony Michael Respondent: Lurdhu Nadhan Advocate & M. Gregory Retna Raj This civil dispute concerns a 1 acre 27 cent agricultural property in Tandayaar village leased for poultry farming since 2017. The witness (respondent) testified that he received monthly rent of Rs. 7,500 deposited in his bank account until the petition was filed; rent payments were made regularly even during the pandemic. He denied the petitioner's claims of arrears and stated the property remains vacant pending court proceedings. The court's examination confirmed the lease arrangement and rent payment history through documentary evidence, with the respondent's testimony corroborating the lease terms and continuous rent remittance until the litigation commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts