Antony Michael @ Antony vs Lurdhu Nadhan Advocate - Thiru.M. Gregory Retna Raj — 83/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTL080008652023

Arguments

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

99/2023

Filing Date

18-07-2023

Registration No

83/2023

Registration Date

18-07-2023

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor

Judge

2-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1

Petitioner(s)

Antony Michael @ Antony

Adv. Thiru.S. Subash

Respondent(s)

Lurdhu Nadhan Advocate - Thiru.M. Gregory Retna Raj

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif

10-06-2026

Arguments

27-04-2026

Arguments

06-04-2026

Arguments

14-03-2026

Evidence

06-03-2026

Lok Adalat

Interim Orders

20-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case 83/2023 Summary Court: Primary District Civil Court, Valliyur Date: 20.02.2026 Petitioner: Antony Michael Respondent: Lurdhu Nadhan Advocate & M. Gregory Retna Raj This civil dispute concerns a 1 acre 27 cent agricultural property in Tandayaar village leased for poultry farming since 2017. The witness (respondent) testified that he received monthly rent of Rs. 7,500 deposited in his bank account until the petition was filed; rent payments were made regularly even during the pandemic. He denied the petitioner's claims of arrears and stated the property remains vacant pending court proceedings. The court's examination confirmed the lease arrangement and rent payment history through documentary evidence, with the respondent's testimony corroborating the lease terms and continuous rent remittance until the litigation commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 83/2023 Summary Court: Primary District Civil Court, Valliyur Date: 20.02.2026 Petitioner: Antony Michael Respondent: Lurdhu Nadhan Advocate & M. Gregory Retna Raj This civil dispute concerns a 1 acre 27 cent agricultural property in Tandayaar village leased for poultry farming since 2017. The witness (respondent) testified that he received monthly rent of Rs. 7,500 deposited in his bank account until the petition was filed; rent payments were made regularly even during the pandemic. He denied the petitioner's claims of arrears and stated the property remains vacant pending court proceedings. The court's examination confirmed the lease arrangement and rent payment history through documentary evidence, with the respondent's testimony corroborating the lease terms and continuous rent remittance until the litigation commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case