J. Sterney through his General Power of Attorney S.Jeyaseelan vs V. Thangaraj Nadar Advocate - Thiru.R. Pandiaraja — 75/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTL080008552023
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
91/2023
Filing Date
06-07-2023
Registration No
75/2023
Registration Date
06-07-2023
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor
Judge
3-Additional District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
J. Sterney through his General Power of Attorney S.Jeyaseelan
Adv. Thiru.T.A. Davidson
Respondent(s)
V. Thangaraj Nadar Advocate - Thiru.R. Pandiaraja
T. Pal @ Balakrishnan Nadar
Adv. Thiru.R. Pandiaraja
S. Anbu Raja Nadar
Adv. Thiru.R. Pandiaraja
S. Ravichandran
Adv. Thiru.R. Pandiaraja
P. Ponsekar Nadar
Adv. Thiru.R. Pandiaraja
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Lok Adalat
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 75/2023 This property dispute case involves cross-examination of the petitioner's witness. The petitioner claims ownership of land in Valliyur and disputes the respondents' rights to adjoining property. Key contentions include: existence of a house on the disputed plot, electricity connection validity, survey number boundaries, and whether respondents have trespassed on the petitioner's land. The court recorded the witness's testimony on property boundaries, access roads, fencing, and competing claims to approximately 1.5 meters of adjacent land. Cross-examination concluded with no further examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 75/2023 This property dispute case involves cross-examination of the petitioner's witness. The petitioner claims ownership of land in Valliyur and disputes the respondents' rights to adjoining property. Key contentions include: existence of a house on the disputed plot, electricity connection validity, survey number boundaries, and whether respondents have trespassed on the petitioner's land. The court recorded the witness's testimony on property boundaries, access roads, fencing, and competing claims to approximately 1.5 meters of adjacent land. Cross-examination concluded with no further examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts