J. Sterney through his General Power of Attorney S.Jeyaseelan vs V. Thangaraj Nadar Advocate - Thiru.R. Pandiaraja — 75/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTL080008552023

Filing Number

91/2023

Filing Date

06-Jul-2023

Registration No

75/2023

Registration Date

06-Jul-2023

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor

Judge

3-Additional District Munsif

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.J. Sterney through his General Power of Attorney S.Jeyaseelan

    Adv. Thiru.T.A. Davidson

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V. Thangaraj Nadar Advocate - Thiru.R. Pandiaraja

  2. 2.T. Pal @ Balakrishnan Nadar

    Adv. Thiru.R. Pandiaraja

  3. 3.S. Anbu Raja Nadar

    Adv. Thiru.R. Pandiaraja

  4. 4.S. Ravichandran

    Adv. Thiru.R. Pandiaraja

  5. 5.P. Ponsekar Nadar

    Adv. Thiru.R. Pandiaraja

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Additional District Munsif

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 75/2023 This property dispute case involves cross-examination of the petitioner's witness. The petitioner claims ownership of land in Valliyur and disputes the respondents' rights to adjoining property. Key contentions include: existence of a house on the disputed plot, electricity connection validity, survey number boundaries, and whether respondents have trespassed on the petitioner's land. The court recorded the witness's testimony on property boundaries, access roads, fencing, and competing claims to approximately 1.5 meters of adjacent land. Cross-examination concluded with no further examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  11. 19-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  13. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  14. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  15. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  16. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  17. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  18. 19-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  20. 12-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  21. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Munsif

  22. 07-Nov-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  23. 07-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  24. 01-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif

  25. 27-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif

  26. 15-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Munsif

  27. 08-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  28. 26-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  29. 12-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Munsif

  30. 08-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Munsif

  31. 26-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  32. 18-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  33. 18-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  34. 03-Jun-2025

    Additional Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  35. 05-Apr-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Munsif

  36. 14-Mar-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Munsif

  37. 26-Feb-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Munsif

  38. 03-Feb-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Munsif

  39. 02-Jan-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Munsif

  40. 05-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  41. 05-Nov-2024

    Steps

    Principal District Munsif

  42. 21-Oct-2024

    Steps

    Principal District Munsif

  43. 10-Sep-2024

    Steps

    Principal District Munsif

  44. 15-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  45. 05-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  46. 15-Apr-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  47. 04-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  48. 06-Feb-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  49. 06-Feb-2024

    Orders

    Principal District Munsif

  50. 23-Jan-2024

    Orders

    Principal District Munsif

  51. 11-Dec-2023

    IA Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  52. 30-Nov-2023

    IA Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  53. 16-Nov-2023

    IA Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  54. 17-Oct-2023

    IA Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  55. 16-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  56. 03-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  57. 20-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  58. 08-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  59. 06-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 06-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 75/2023 This property dispute case involves cross-examination of the petitioner's witness. The petitioner claims ownership of land in Valliyur and disputes the respondents' rights to adjoining property. Key contentions include: existence of a house on the disputed plot, electricity connection validity, survey number boundaries, and whether respondents have trespassed on the petitioner's land. The court recorded the witness's testimony on property boundaries, access roads, fencing, and competing claims to approximately 1.5 meters of adjacent land. Cross-examination concluded with no further examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case