Arumugam vs Packia Seelan — 101/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Trial Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTL080006332024

Filing Number

118/2024

Filing Date

30-Sep-2024

Registration No

101/2024

Registration Date

30-Sep-2024

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor

Judge

2-Principal District Munsif

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arumugam

    Adv. Thiru.V.Ramnath Iyer

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Packia Seelan

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Munsif

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  7. 13-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Munsif

  9. 23-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  10. 16-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  11. 25-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  12. 12-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  13. 11-Jul-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Arumugam v. Packia Seelan (IA No. 02/2024 in O.S. No. 101/2024) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of Arumugam (petitioner/tenant) against Packia Seelan (respondent/landlord). The respondent and his agents are restrained from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of eight non-residential shop premises until the suit is disposed of by due process of law. The court found that while the initial lease expired on 31.03.2024 and a termination notice was issued on 15.09.2024, the petitioner's tenancy converted to "tenancy at sufferance" rather than outright termination, and the petitioner can only be evicted through proper legal proceedings, not by forcible action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 11-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  15. 04-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  16. 30-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  17. 26-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Principal District Munsif

  18. 12-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Principal District Munsif

  19. 07-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  20. 25-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  21. 30-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  22. 07-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  23. 16-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  24. 21-Nov-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  25. 30-Oct-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District Munsif

  26. 16-Oct-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Munsif

  27. 30-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 30-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Arumugam v. Packia Seelan (IA No. 02/2024 in O.S. No. 101/2024) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of Arumugam (petitioner/tenant) against Packia Seelan (respondent/landlord). The respondent and his agents are restrained from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of eight non-residential shop premises until the suit is disposed of by due process of law. The court found that while the initial lease expired on 31.03.2024 and a termination notice was issued on 15.09.2024, the petitioner's tenancy converted to "tenancy at sufferance" rather than outright termination, and the petitioner can only be evicted through proper legal proceedings, not by forcible action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case