Arumugam vs Packia Seelan — 101/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTL080006332024
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
118/2024
Filing Date
30-09-2024
Registration No
101/2024
Registration Date
30-09-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arumugam
Adv. Thiru.V.Ramnath Iyer
Respondent(s)
Packia Seelan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif
Trial
Trial
Lok Adalat
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Trial |
| 14-03-2026 | Trial |
| 25-02-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 21-01-2026 | Trial |
| 18-12-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Arumugam v. Packia Seelan (IA No. 02/2024 in O.S. No. 101/2024) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of Arumugam (petitioner/tenant) against Packia Seelan (respondent/landlord). The respondent and his agents are restrained from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of eight non-residential shop premises until the suit is disposed of by due process of law. The court found that while the initial lease expired on 31.03.2024 and a termination notice was issued on 15.09.2024, the petitioner's tenancy converted to "tenancy at sufferance" rather than outright termination, and the petitioner can only be evicted through proper legal proceedings, not by forcible action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Arumugam v. Packia Seelan (IA No. 02/2024 in O.S. No. 101/2024) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of Arumugam (petitioner/tenant) against Packia Seelan (respondent/landlord). The respondent and his agents are restrained from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of eight non-residential shop premises until the suit is disposed of by due process of law. The court found that while the initial lease expired on 31.03.2024 and a termination notice was issued on 15.09.2024, the petitioner's tenancy converted to "tenancy at sufferance" rather than outright termination, and the petitioner can only be evicted through proper legal proceedings, not by forcible action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts