Arumugam vs Packia Seelan — 101/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTL080006332024

Trial

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

118/2024

Filing Date

30-09-2024

Registration No

101/2024

Registration Date

30-09-2024

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor

Judge

2-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1

Petitioner(s)

Arumugam

Adv. Thiru.V.Ramnath Iyer

Respondent(s)

Packia Seelan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif

21-04-2026

Trial

14-03-2026

Trial

25-02-2026

Lok Adalat

21-01-2026

Trial

18-12-2025

Trial

Interim Orders

11-07-2025
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Arumugam v. Packia Seelan (IA No. 02/2024 in O.S. No. 101/2024) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of Arumugam (petitioner/tenant) against Packia Seelan (respondent/landlord). The respondent and his agents are restrained from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of eight non-residential shop premises until the suit is disposed of by due process of law. The court found that while the initial lease expired on 31.03.2024 and a termination notice was issued on 15.09.2024, the petitioner's tenancy converted to "tenancy at sufferance" rather than outright termination, and the petitioner can only be evicted through proper legal proceedings, not by forcible action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Arumugam v. Packia Seelan (IA No. 02/2024 in O.S. No. 101/2024) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of Arumugam (petitioner/tenant) against Packia Seelan (respondent/landlord). The respondent and his agents are restrained from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of eight non-residential shop premises until the suit is disposed of by due process of law. The court found that while the initial lease expired on 31.03.2024 and a termination notice was issued on 15.09.2024, the petitioner's tenancy converted to "tenancy at sufferance" rather than outright termination, and the petitioner can only be evicted through proper legal proceedings, not by forcible action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case