Puthumai Lakshmi vs Government of Tamilnadu through its the District Collector Advocate - Thiru.V.Muthukrishnan — 69/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTL080005812024
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
86/2024
Filing Date
21-08-2024
Registration No
69/2024
Registration Date
21-08-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Puthumai Lakshmi
Adv. Thiru.J.Magesh
Vijaya
Respondent(s)
Government of Tamilnadu through its the District Collector Advocate - Thiru.V.Muthukrishnan
The Tahsildar, Radhapuram
Adv. Thiru.V.Muthukrishnan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif
Trial
Additional Written Statement
Lok Adalat
Additional Written Statement
Additional Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Trial |
| 14-03-2026 | Additional Written Statement |
| 07-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 23-02-2026 | Additional Written Statement |
| 02-02-2026 | Additional Written Statement |
Interim Orders
The petition filed by Puthumai Lakshmi and Vijaya seeking amendment of the pleadings in the original case under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 was ALLOWED. The court permitted the petitioners to correct a factual error in paragraph 2 of the plaint, where the death date of their father (28.11.2015) was mistakenly mentioned instead of their brother Dharmaraj's actual death date (22.08.2016), and approved the amendment as necessary to prevent future disputes between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition filed by Puthumai Lakshmi and Vijaya seeking amendment of the pleadings in the original case under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 was ALLOWED. The court permitted the petitioners to correct a factual error in paragraph 2 of the plaint, where the death date of their father (28.11.2015) was mistakenly mentioned instead of their brother Dharmaraj's actual death date (22.08.2016), and approved the amendment as necessary to prevent future disputes between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts