Venkateshwaran vs Bharathi thasan — 62/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Lok Adalat. Next hearing: 13th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTL080002782023
Filing Number
105/2023
Filing Date
06-Jun-2023
Registration No
62/2023
Registration Date
06-Jun-2023
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor
Judge
3-Additional District Munsif
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Venkateshwaran
Adv. Thiru. Suresh kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bharathi thasan
Case History
-
13-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Lok Adalat
Additional District Munsif
-
30-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
14-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
20-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: In CC No. 62/2023 before the Additional District Court, Valliyoor (dated 20.01.2026), a witness was re-examined and cross-examined by the opposing counsel in a civil suit between Venkateshwaran (petitioner) and Bharathi Thasan (respondent). The case involves a dispute over a loan of Rs. 1,30,000 allegedly borrowed in 2016-2017, with conflicting testimonies regarding the amount, repayment, and a cheque. The cross-examination of the petitioner's witness concluded with no re-examination permitted. The case proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
13-Dec-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
27-Nov-2025
Lok Adalat
Additional District Munsif
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
23-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Additional District Munsif
-
16-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Additional District Munsif
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
31-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
14-Jun-2025
Lok Adalat
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Jun-2025
Lok Adalat
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Apr-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Jul-2024
Evidence
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Jun-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Additional District Munsif
-
05-Apr-2024
Questioning
Additional District Munsif
-
09-Mar-2024
Questioning
Additional District Munsif
-
23-Feb-2024
Lok Adalat
Additional District Munsif
-
12-Jan-2024
Questioning
Additional District Munsif
-
08-Dec-2023
Questioning
Additional District Munsif
-
03-Nov-2023
Copies
Additional District Munsif
-
22-Sep-2023
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Additional District Munsif
-
07-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 62/2023
Case Summary: In CC No. 62/2023 before the Additional District Court, Valliyoor (dated 20.01.2026), a witness was re-examined and cross-examined by the opposing counsel in a civil suit between Venkateshwaran (petitioner) and Bharathi Thasan (respondent). The case involves a dispute over a loan of Rs. 1,30,000 allegedly borrowed in 2016-2017, with conflicting testimonies regarding the amount, repayment, and a cheque. The cross-examination of the petitioner's witness concluded with no re-examination permitted. The case proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts