M. Chitra vs Velammal — 77/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTL080001432025
Filing Number
119/2025
Filing Date
01-Aug-2025
Registration No
77/2025
Registration Date
01-Aug-2025
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M. Chitra
Adv. Thiru. S.Raja
Respondent(s)
-
1.Velammal
-
2.Sudalai
-
3.Esakkiyammal
-
4.Vennila
-
5.Vengatesh
-
6.Naveena
-
7.Esaiselvi
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
14-Mar-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
03-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
Principal District Munsif
-
21-Jan-2026
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
13-Dec-2025
Trial
Principal District Munsif
-
01-Dec-2025
Lok Adalat
Principal District Munsif
-
27-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
17-Sep-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 77/2025 Summary Petition Dismissed. M. Chitra's application for temporary injunction to restrain respondent Esakkiammal from constructing on the disputed property was dismissed on 17 September 2025. The court found that the property was already allocated to Murugan (and subsequently to Esakkiammal through a 2017 sale deed) via oral family partition, and that Esakkiammal has been in possession and enjoying the property since 2017, evidenced by tax receipts and utility bills in her name. The court noted Chitra failed to file her partition suit promptly despite knowing of the respondent's possession and rejected her claim as lacking bona fides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
03-Sep-2025
Orders
Principal District Munsif
-
01-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Munsif
-
01-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2025
Case 77/2025 Summary Petition Dismissed. M. Chitra's application for temporary injunction to restrain respondent Esakkiammal from constructing on the disputed property was dismissed on 17 September 2025. The court found that the property was already allocated to Murugan (and subsequently to Esakkiammal through a 2017 sale deed) via oral family partition, and that Esakkiammal has been in possession and enjoying the property since 2017, evidenced by tax receipts and utility bills in her name. The court noted Chitra failed to file her partition suit promptly despite knowing of the respondent's possession and rejected her claim as lacking bona fides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts