M. Chitra vs Velammal — 77/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTL080001432025

Trial

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

119/2025

Filing Date

01-08-2025

Registration No

77/2025

Registration Date

01-08-2025

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor

Judge

2-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1

Petitioner(s)

M. Chitra

Adv. Thiru. S.Raja

Respondent(s)

Velammal

Sudalai

Esakkiyammal

Vennila

Vengatesh

Naveena

Esaiselvi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif

07-04-2026

Trial

14-03-2026

Trial

03-03-2026

Lok Adalat

21-01-2026

Trial

13-12-2025

Trial

Interim Orders

17-09-2025
Copy of Judgment

Case 77/2025 Summary Petition Dismissed. M. Chitra's application for temporary injunction to restrain respondent Esakkiammal from constructing on the disputed property was dismissed on 17 September 2025. The court found that the property was already allocated to Murugan (and subsequently to Esakkiammal through a 2017 sale deed) via oral family partition, and that Esakkiammal has been in possession and enjoying the property since 2017, evidenced by tax receipts and utility bills in her name. The court noted Chitra failed to file her partition suit promptly despite knowing of the respondent's possession and rejected her claim as lacking bona fides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 77/2025 Summary Petition Dismissed. M. Chitra's application for temporary injunction to restrain respondent Esakkiammal from constructing on the disputed property was dismissed on 17 September 2025. The court found that the property was already allocated to Murugan (and subsequently to Esakkiammal through a 2017 sale deed) via oral family partition, and that Esakkiammal has been in possession and enjoying the property since 2017, evidenced by tax receipts and utility bills in her name. The court noted Chitra failed to file her partition suit promptly despite knowing of the respondent's possession and rejected her claim as lacking bona fides. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case