Ramapandi vs Ashwinkumar Advocate - Thiru.H.Mohamed Reyas, Thiru.H.Mohamed Reyas — 93/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTL080001202022

Filing Number

145/2022

Filing Date

02-Sep-2022

Registration No

93/2022

Registration Date

06-Sep-2022

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Vallioor

Judge

2-Principal District Munsif

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramapandi

    Adv. Thiru.S. Subash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ashwinkumar Advocate - Thiru.H.Mohamed Reyas, Thiru.H.Mohamed Reyas

  2. 2.Bashkaran

    Adv. Thiru.H.Mohamed Reyas,Thiru.H.Mohamed Reyas

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Munsif

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Munsif

  10. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  12. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  13. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  14. 23-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 93/2022 Court: Principal District Civil Court, Valliyur Date: 23.09.2025 Petitioner: Ramapandi Respondents: Ashwinkumar Advocate, H. Mohamed Reyas, Bashkaran Outcome: The court completed cross-examination of the witness and recorded detailed findings on disputed land matters involving survey numbers 1284/1 and 1284/2 across multiple parcels. The court examined ownership transfers, sale deeds, land subdivisions, access rights, and utility connections. The case involves competing claims over approximately 1 acre 32 cents of land and questions regarding proper access to the petitioner's property. The order documents witness testimony and judicial observations but does not render a final judgment; the case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  16. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  17. 26-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  19. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  20. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  21. 10-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  22. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  23. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  24. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  25. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  26. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  27. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  28. 01-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  29. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  30. 27-Jan-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  31. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  32. 17-Dec-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  33. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  34. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  35. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  36. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  37. 14-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  38. 12-Aug-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Munsif

  39. 15-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  40. 15-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  41. 03-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  42. 18-Mar-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  43. 18-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  44. 02-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  45. 13-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  46. 24-Jan-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  47. 24-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Munsif

  48. 14-Dec-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  49. 16-Oct-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  50. 25-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  51. 11-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Principal District Munsif

  52. 05-Aug-2023

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  53. 17-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  54. 01-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  55. 14-Jun-2023

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  56. 29-Mar-2023

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  57. 27-Feb-2023

    Issues

    Principal District Munsif

  58. 12-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  59. 23-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  60. 11-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Principal District Munsif

  61. 06-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  62. 02-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 93/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 93/2022 Court: Principal District Civil Court, Valliyur Date: 23.09.2025 Petitioner: Ramapandi Respondents: Ashwinkumar Advocate, H. Mohamed Reyas, Bashkaran Outcome: The court completed cross-examination of the witness and recorded detailed findings on disputed land matters involving survey numbers 1284/1 and 1284/2 across multiple parcels. The court examined ownership transfers, sale deeds, land subdivisions, access rights, and utility connections. The case involves competing claims over approximately 1 acre 32 cents of land and questions regarding proper access to the petitioner's property. The order documents witness testimony and judicial observations but does not render a final judgment; the case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case