Minor Harwin rep by his father Senthil Murugan vs V.B.C.Sankar Advocate - Thiru.V.Ramnath Iyer — 185/2018

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section Sec166-140. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 17-Jul-2026

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTL070006822018

Filing Number

631/2018

Filing Date

02-Nov-2018

Registration No

185/2018

Registration Date

02-Nov-2018

Court

Sub Court, Vallioor

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section Sec166-140

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Minor Harwin rep by his father Senthil Murugan

    Adv. Thiru.S.Ragupathy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V.B.C.Sankar Advocate - Thiru.V.Ramnath Iyer

  2. 2.Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd

    Adv. Thiru.A.Nagarajan

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 21-Mar-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal case (185/2018) involved a minor (Harwin) represented by his father (Senthil Murugan) as petitioner against advocate V.B.C. Sankar, V. Ramnath Iyer, and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The RTO witness testified that the driver in question did not possess a valid driving license as of the claimed date (05.02.2018), and a penalty of Rs. 1,000 was imposed for operating without proper credentials; the tribunal recorded this evidence and dismissed the respondent's case based on insufficient documentation of driving license validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 07-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 30-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 26-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 23-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 22-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 03-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 08-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 23-Jun-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  26. 23-Jun-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  27. 23-Jun-2023

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 24-Mar-2023

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 06-Jan-2023

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 11-Nov-2022

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 26-Aug-2022

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 01-Jul-2022

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 01-Apr-2022

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 21-Jan-2022

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 17-Sep-2021

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 06-Aug-2021

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 11-Jun-2021

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 26-Mar-2021

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 12-Feb-2021

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 18-Dec-2020

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 09-Oct-2020

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 14-Aug-2020

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  43. 12-Jun-2020

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  44. 14-Feb-2020

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  45. 08-Nov-2019

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  46. 16-Aug-2019

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  47. 07-Jun-2019

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  48. 15-Feb-2019

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  49. 21-Dec-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 02-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 185/2018

casestatus.in Summary

This Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal case (185/2018) involved a minor (Harwin) represented by his father (Senthil Murugan) as petitioner against advocate V.B.C. Sankar, V. Ramnath Iyer, and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The RTO witness testified that the driver in question did not possess a valid driving license as of the claimed date (05.02.2018), and a penalty of Rs. 1,000 was imposed for operating without proper credentials; the tribunal recorded this evidence and dismissed the respondent's case based on insufficient documentation of driving license validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case