Esakkiammal vs Ramesh — 42/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166, 140. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTL070003562024

e-Filing Number

27-02-2024

Filing Number

323/2024

Filing Date

27-Feb-2024

Registration No

42/2024

Registration Date

05-Jul-2024

Court

Sub Court, Vallioor

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166, 140

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Esakkiammal

    Adv. Ragupathy S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh

  2. 2.Branch Manager, Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited, Chennai

    Adv. Thiru.A.Nagarajan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 42/2024 Summary The Lok Adalat settled a dispute between petitioner Esakkiammal and Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited (Branch Manager, Chennai). The parties reached a compromise, and the respondent was ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 48,480/- to the petitioner, to be transferred directly to her bank account within one month from the award date. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 21-Nov-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 28-Aug-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 20-Jun-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 20-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 09-Aug-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 05-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 27-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 42/2024 Summary The Lok Adalat settled a dispute between petitioner Esakkiammal and Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited (Branch Manager, Chennai). The parties reached a compromise, and the respondent was ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 48,480/- to the petitioner, to be transferred directly to her bank account within one month from the award date. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case