E.Murugan vs B.Murugeshwari Advocate - M.S.Vijay Anand — 223/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 30,27c. Status: Lok Adalat. Next hearing: 13th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTL060003082023

Lok Adalat

Next Hearing

13th June 2026

Filing Number

349/2023

Filing Date

01-06-2023

Registration No

223/2023

Registration Date

08-06-2023

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli

Judge

12-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 30,27c
IA/3/2024 Classification : Injunction Petition Section E.MuruganB.Murugeshwari
IA/4/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section E.MuruganB.Murugeshwari
IA/5/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section E.MuruganB.Murugeshwari
IA/6/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section E.MuruganB.Murugeshwari

Petitioner(s)

E.Murugan

Adv. I.V.Subasree

Respondent(s)

B.Murugeshwari Advocate - M.S.Vijay Anand

Velu

Deivanai (late)

Esakkiammal alias Deepa

Iswariya

Manikandan

Hearing History

Judge: 12-Principal District Munsif

17-04-2026

Lok Adalat

14-03-2026

Issues

11-02-2026

Lok Adalat

05-01-2026

Issues

01-12-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

13-02-2025
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: E. Murugan v. B. Murugeshwari (O.S. No. 223/2023) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondent, her persons, agents, and servants from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural property until final disposal of the suit. The respondent's undertaking not to create encumbrances or cause interference also supported the order. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: E. Murugan v. B. Murugeshwari (O.S. No. 223/2023) Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondent, her persons, agents, and servants from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural property until final disposal of the suit. The respondent's undertaking not to create encumbrances or cause interference also supported the order. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case