Jebasam Alexander vs The General Manager, Vish Wind Infrastructure Ltd., Tirunelveli Advocate - M.P.Dhamodaran — 139/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTL060002012023

Part Heard

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

241/2023

Filing Date

31-03-2023

Registration No

139/2023

Registration Date

31-03-2023

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli

Judge

12-Principal District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 27(c)
IA/9/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section Jebasam AlexanderThe General Manager, Vish Wind Infrastructure Ltd., Tirunelveli
IA/10/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section Jebasam AlexanderThe General Manager, Vish Wind Infrastructure Ltd., Tirunelveli

Petitioner(s)

Jebasam Alexander

Adv. Thiru. P.H.A.Tamilarasar

Respondent(s)

The General Manager, Vish Wind Infrastructure Ltd., Tirunelveli Advocate - M.P.Dhamodaran

Hearing History

Judge: 12-Principal District Munsif

10-06-2026

Part Heard

29-04-2026

Part Heard

16-04-2026

Part Heard

25-03-2026

Part Heard

14-03-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

02-07-2025
Copy of Deposition

In O.S.No. 139/2023 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli, petitioner Jebasam Alexander (age 45) filed a civil suit and presented his examination-in-chief testimony on 02.07.2025, submitting seven documentary exhibits including property pattas, power of attorney letters, and revenue receipts. The court adjourned the first hearing to allow the respondent's counsel to file additional exhibits, with further proceedings to continue for cross-examination and document marking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In O.S.No. 139/2023 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli, petitioner Jebasam Alexander (age 45) filed a civil suit and presented his examination-in-chief testimony on 02.07.2025, submitting seven documentary exhibits including property pattas, power of attorney letters, and revenue receipts. The court adjourned the first hearing to allow the respondent's counsel to file additional exhibits, with further proceedings to continue for cross-examination and document marking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case