Sudalaiyandi alias Murugesan vs Chellammal and 3 others — 155/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7 R1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTL060001892025

Trial

Next Hearing

17th July 2026

Filing Number

235/2025

Filing Date

29-04-2025

Registration No

155/2025

Registration Date

29-04-2025

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli

Judge

13-I Additional District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7 R1
IA/1/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section Sudalaiyandi alias MurugesanChellammal and 3 others
IA/2/2025 Classification : Injunction Petition Section Sudalaiyandi alias MurugesanChellammal and 3 others

Petitioner(s)

Sudalaiyandi alias Murugesan

Adv. Ramakrishnan R

Respondent(s)

Chellammal and 3 others

Venkatesan

Ari Raman

Ari Raman

Hearing History

Judge: 13-I Additional District Munsif

02-04-2026

Trial

14-03-2026

Lok Adalat

02-03-2026

Lok Adalat

24-02-2026

Orders

17-02-2026

Orders

Interim Orders

03-01-2026
IA
03-01-2026
IA
03-01-2026
IA
03-01-2026
IA

Case 155/2025 Summary The 1st Additional District Civil Court, Tirunelveli permitted petitioner Sudalaiyandi's application to file a counter-reply, setting aside the ex-parte order dated 06.10.2025 issued against him. The court accepted that the petitioner's lawyer's health issues and delay in obtaining revenue department details justified the failure to file the counter-reply on time. The court allowed the petition on condition that petitioner pay ₹750 to respondents by 09.01.2026, granting him an opportunity to present his case rather than suffer dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 155/2025 Summary The 1st Additional District Civil Court, Tirunelveli permitted petitioner Sudalaiyandi's application to file a counter-reply, setting aside the ex-parte order dated 06.10.2025 issued against him. The court accepted that the petitioner's lawyer's health issues and delay in obtaining revenue department details justified the failure to file the counter-reply on time. The court allowed the petition on condition that petitioner pay ₹750 to respondents by 09.01.2026, granting him an opportunity to present his case rather than suffer dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case