M.Pitchammal and 2 others vs P.Edwin Jose and 3 others — 304/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTL010193802022
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
3566/2022
Filing Date
23-12-2022
Registration No
304/2023
Registration Date
22-02-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Tirunelveli
Judge
2-I-Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Pitchammal and 2 others
Adv. Thiru. A.Selvaraj, B.Sc., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
P.Edwin Jose and 3 others
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I-Additional District Judge
Part Heard
Part Heard
Lok Adalat
Lok Adalat
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 26-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 14-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 10-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 05-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document records the witness deposition of PW-2 (a 51-year-old laborer) in case M.C.O.P. No.304/2023 before the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, dated July 24, 2025. The witness testified that he is the third petitioner's second witness in a case involving an accident, provided an affidavit, and underwent cross-examination by respondents 2 and 3 regarding his work details and daily schedule. The witness confirmed his testimony as truthful and denied allegations that his statement was false or biased due to family relationship with an accused party, with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the witness deposition of PW-2 (a 51-year-old laborer) in case M.C.O.P. No.304/2023 before the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, dated July 24, 2025. The witness testified that he is the third petitioner's second witness in a case involving an accident, provided an affidavit, and underwent cross-examination by respondents 2 and 3 regarding his work details and daily schedule. The witness confirmed his testimony as truthful and denied allegations that his statement was false or biased due to family relationship with an accused party, with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts