M.Pitchammal and 2 others vs P.Edwin Jose and 3 others — 304/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTL010193802022

Part Heard

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

3566/2022

Filing Date

23-12-2022

Registration No

304/2023

Registration Date

22-02-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Tirunelveli

Judge

2-I-Additional District Judge

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

M.Pitchammal and 2 others

Adv. Thiru. A.Selvaraj, B.Sc., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

P.Edwin Jose and 3 others

Hearing History

Judge: 2-I-Additional District Judge

09-04-2026

Part Heard

26-03-2026

Part Heard

14-03-2026

Lok Adalat

10-03-2026

Lok Adalat

05-03-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

24-07-2025
Copy of Deposition

This document records the witness deposition of PW-2 (a 51-year-old laborer) in case M.C.O.P. No.304/2023 before the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, dated July 24, 2025. The witness testified that he is the third petitioner's second witness in a case involving an accident, provided an affidavit, and underwent cross-examination by respondents 2 and 3 regarding his work details and daily schedule. The witness confirmed his testimony as truthful and denied allegations that his statement was false or biased due to family relationship with an accused party, with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the witness deposition of PW-2 (a 51-year-old laborer) in case M.C.O.P. No.304/2023 before the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, dated July 24, 2025. The witness testified that he is the third petitioner's second witness in a case involving an accident, provided an affidavit, and underwent cross-examination by respondents 2 and 3 regarding his work details and daily schedule. The witness confirmed his testimony as truthful and denied allegations that his statement was false or biased due to family relationship with an accused party, with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tirunelveli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case