Ahamed Meera vs Nabisha Beevi (Died) Advocate - Krishnamoorthy LKR — 284/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or7,R1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTL010094692021
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
2431/2021
Filing Date
24-09-2021
Registration No
284/2021
Registration Date
08-10-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Tirunelveli
Judge
2-I-Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ahamed Meera
Adv. A.S.Ahamed
Respondent(s)
Nabisha Beevi (Died) Advocate - Krishnamoorthy LKR
S.K. Hameem
Adv. Krishnamoorthy LKR
S.K. Malkhan
Adv. Krishnamoorthy LKR
S.K. Sheik Mohammed
Adv. Krishnamoorthy LKR
S.K. Nagoor Meeran
Adv. Krishnamoorthy LKR
S.K. Hyder Ali
Adv. Krishnamoorthy LKR
S.K. Asan Pathu
S.K.Hameed Pathu
Adv. Kamalanathan S B
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I-Additional District Judge
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | Part Heard |
| 01-06-2026 | Part Heard |
| 22-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 23-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 284/2021 Date: 22.04.2026 | Court: Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli On this date, the court examined Defence Witness 3 (D.W.3), with cross-examination by the plaintiff's counsel. The witness testified regarding property matters, including properties purchased in 1971, the nature of joint family property, and a settlement deed executed by the father on 23.12.2005 favoring male heirs. The witness denied bias against female heirs and stated his testimony was truthful. The court recorded the testimony and acknowledged its correctness. No final order on the petition itself is reflected in this interim proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 284/2021 Date: 22.04.2026 | Court: Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli On this date, the court examined Defence Witness 3 (D.W.3), with cross-examination by the plaintiff's counsel. The witness testified regarding property matters, including properties purchased in 1971, the nature of joint family property, and a settlement deed executed by the father on 23.12.2005 favoring male heirs. The witness denied bias against female heirs and stated his testimony was truthful. The court recorded the testimony and acknowledged its correctness. No final order on the petition itself is reflected in this interim proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts