Sheik Mohamed Ali vs Mohamed Pathu — 81/2025

Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th June 2026.

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNTL010056342025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-07-2025

Filing Number

3848/2025

Filing Date

09-07-2025

Registration No

81/2025

Registration Date

01-11-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Tirunelveli

Judge

2-I-Additional District Judge

Decision Date

05th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

Police Station

Melapalayam P.S.,

Year

0

Acts & Sections

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 Section 29

Petitioner(s)

Sheik Mohamed Ali

Adv. M Muthuraj

Respondent(s)

Mohamed Pathu

Hearing History

Judge: 2-I-Additional District Judge

05-06-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

Judgement

21-04-2026

Judgement

10-04-2026

Arguments

07-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

05-06-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Sheik Mohamed Ali v. Mohamed Pathu (C.A. 81/2025) The appellate court dismissed Sheik Mohamed Ali's appeal and confirmed the trial court's maintenance order under the Domestic Violence Act. The respondent (Mohamed Pathu) must pay Rs. 1,83,000 for children's educational expenses within two months and Rs. 4,000 monthly to his wife plus Rs. 2,500 each to three minor children on the 5th of each month. The court held that the husband has a legal responsibility to maintain his family according to his living status, rejecting his contentions about income limitations and document authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sheik Mohamed Ali v. Mohamed Pathu (C.A. 81/2025) The appellate court dismissed Sheik Mohamed Ali's appeal and confirmed the trial court's maintenance order under the Domestic Violence Act. The respondent (Mohamed Pathu) must pay Rs. 1,83,000 for children's educational expenses within two months and Rs. 4,000 monthly to his wife plus Rs. 2,500 each to three minor children on the 5th of each month. The court held that the husband has a legal responsibility to maintain his family according to his living status, rejecting his contentions about income limitations and document authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Tirunelveli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case