G.Jayalakshmi and 3 others vs R. Sathiskumar Advocate - T.Sivakumar, M.A.,B.L., — 494/2019
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ270024772019
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
10494/2019
Filing Date
01-11-2019
Registration No
494/2019
Registration Date
01-11-2019
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.Jayalakshmi and 3 others
Adv. Tr.M.P.Manoharan M.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
R. Sathiskumar Advocate - T.Sivakumar, M.A.,B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 18-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (DW-1) recorded in civil case O.S.494/2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Thiruvidaimaruthur on 25.02.2026. The witness, Sathish Kumar (age 48), testified regarding a property dispute involving land ownership documents, denying knowledge of certain sale deeds and challenging the authenticity of documents allegedly filed by the plaintiff party, while maintaining that the disputed property does not belong to the plaintiffs. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness, and acknowledged as correct by the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (DW-1) recorded in civil case O.S.494/2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Thiruvidaimaruthur on 25.02.2026. The witness, Sathish Kumar (age 48), testified regarding a property dispute involving land ownership documents, denying knowledge of certain sale deeds and challenging the authenticity of documents allegedly filed by the plaintiff party, while maintaining that the disputed property does not belong to the plaintiffs. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness, and acknowledged as correct by the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts