Rasathi vs Chitra — 265/2019
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7,1,27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ270024542019
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
10265/2019
Filing Date
05-11-2019
Registration No
265/2019
Registration Date
05-11-2019
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rasathi
Adv. V.G.Ravikumar, B.Sc., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Chitra
Mohan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW-1) recorded on 11.03.2025 in O.S. 265/2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur. The witness, a 52-year-old male, testified that he is the husband and authorized agent of the plaintiff, and deposed regarding an original mortgage deed dated 18.06.2018, which was subsequently cancelled on 06.12.2018 after receiving full payment of ₹1,50,000, with property ownership transferred to his wife. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness, and acknowledged as correct by him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW-1) recorded on 11.03.2025 in O.S. 265/2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur. The witness, a 52-year-old male, testified that he is the husband and authorized agent of the plaintiff, and deposed regarding an original mortgage deed dated 18.06.2018, which was subsequently cancelled on 06.12.2018 after receiving full payment of ₹1,50,000, with property ownership transferred to his wife. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness, and acknowledged as correct by him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts