Loganathan vs Rajendran and one other Advocate - Tr.S.Kothandaraman B.Com., B.L., — 4/2019

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7, 1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTJ270021102019

Part Heard

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

1004/2019

Filing Date

26-09-2019

Registration No

4/2019

Registration Date

26-09-2019

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 7, 1
IA/1/2019 Classification : Injunction Petition Section LoganathanRajendran and one other

Petitioner(s)

Loganathan

Adv. Tr. K.Cakkarapani, B.A., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

Rajendran and one other Advocate - Tr.S.Kothandaraman B.Com., B.L.,

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

17-04-2026

Part Heard

01-04-2026

Part Heard

25-03-2026

Part Heard

11-03-2026

Part Heard

04-03-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

25-02-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This is a witness deposition (not a court order with a final ruling), not a case judgment. The document records the testimony of PW-2 (a 60-year-old female witness) given on 25.02.2026 in O.S. 4/2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur. The witness testified regarding agricultural land disputes in Aralur village, stating she worked on the plaintiff's land and that the defendant (Rajeendran) currently cultivates his own land; the deposition was recorded, read over to the witness, and acknowledged as correct by the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness deposition (not a court order with a final ruling), not a case judgment. The document records the testimony of PW-2 (a 60-year-old female witness) given on 25.02.2026 in O.S. 4/2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur. The witness testified regarding agricultural land disputes in Aralur village, stating she worked on the plaintiff's land and that the defendant (Rajeendran) currently cultivates his own land; the deposition was recorded, read over to the witness, and acknowledged as correct by the magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case