Inspector of Police, Pandanallur vs Senthil Kumar and 4 others Advocate - Tr.P.R.Jayakumar, M.Com., B.L., — 480/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ270019312019
Next Hearing
29th July 2026
Filing Number
480/2019
Filing Date
20-09-2019
Registration No
480/2019
Registration Date
20-09-2019
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
FIR Details
FIR Number
282
Police Station
Pandanallur Police Station
Year
2011
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Pandanallur
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Senthil Kumar and 4 others Advocate - Tr.P.R.Jayakumar, M.Com., B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 10-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This document records the depositions of two witnesses (PW-4 and PW-5) in criminal case CC 480/2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate court in Thiruvidaimaruthur on 20/03/2023. Both witnesses testified regarding a 2010-2011 theft case (Crime No. 284/2011 under IPC Sections 457, 380) involving five accused; defendants 1 and 3 appeared, defendant 2 was absent (CrPC Section 317 application granted), and defendant 4 is deceased. The witnesses' depositions were recorded, cross-examined, and digitally signed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This document records the depositions of two witnesses (PW-4 and PW-5) in criminal case CC 480/2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate court in Thiruvidaimaruthur on 20/03/2023. Both witnesses testified regarding a 2010-2011 theft case (Crime No. 284/2011 under IPC Sections 457, 380) involving five accused; defendants 1 and 3 appeared, defendant 2 was absent (CrPC Section 317 application granted), and defendant 4 is deceased. The witnesses' depositions were recorded, cross-examined, and digitally signed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts