Forest Officer, Kumbakonam vs Vadivel Advocate - Tr.B.Rajasekar B.A., B.L., — 953/2019
Case under Tn Forest Act, 1882 Section 9 r/w 16(a), 2 (36). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ270019302019
Next Hearing
29th July 2026
Filing Number
953/2019
Filing Date
17-12-2019
Registration No
953/2019
Registration Date
17-12-2019
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
FIR Details
FIR Number
1
Police Station
Forest Range Office, Kumbakonam
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Forest Officer, Kumbakonam
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vadivel Advocate - Tr.B.Rajasekar B.A., B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Trial |
| 10-04-2026 | Trial |
| 27-03-2026 | Trial |
| 18-03-2026 | Trial |
| 11-03-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of witness PW-3 in case CC.953/2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur, dated 18.03.2026. The witness testified regarding allegations of peacock deaths, denying involvement by the accused and claiming to have filed complaints with forest officials, while acknowledging possible bias from prior disputes. The deposition was recorded in Tamil and the witness's statement was digitally documented and signed by the presiding magistrate P. Rangeswari. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of witness PW-3 in case CC.953/2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur, dated 18.03.2026. The witness testified regarding allegations of peacock deaths, denying involvement by the accused and claiming to have filed complaints with forest officials, while acknowledging possible bias from prior disputes. The deposition was recorded in Tamil and the witness's statement was digitally documented and signed by the presiding magistrate P. Rangeswari. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts