Inspector of Police, AWPS-Kumbakonam vs Iliyaraja Advocate - Tr.M.P.Manoharan, M.A., B.L., — 691/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 417,352,354. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTJ270017822019
Next Hearing
29th July 2026
Filing Number
691/2019
Filing Date
17-09-2019
Registration No
691/2019
Registration Date
17-09-2019
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
All Women Police Station, Kumbakonam
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, AWPS-Kumbakonam
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Iliyaraja Advocate - Tr.M.P.Manoharan, M.A., B.L.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 08-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 05-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: Witness deposition recorded on 10.03.2025 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur in case CC.691-2019. The 46-year-old witness (LW-4/PW-7) was sworn in under The Oaths Act 1969 and testified regarding police investigation on 06.11.2015 concerning alleged relations between accused A.Sa.1 and the defendant. The witness's examination-in-chief was completed, recorded digitally, and accepted as correct; cross-examination by the accused was waived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Witness deposition recorded on 10.03.2025 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur in case CC.691-2019. The 46-year-old witness (LW-4/PW-7) was sworn in under The Oaths Act 1969 and testified regarding police investigation on 06.11.2015 concerning alleged relations between accused A.Sa.1 and the defendant. The witness's examination-in-chief was completed, recorded digitally, and accepted as correct; cross-examination by the accused was waived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts