Karpagam vs Anbudoss — 17/2023
Case under Maintenanceordersenforcementact Section 125. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
MC - Maintenance Case
CNR: TNTJ270009602023
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
842/2023
Filing Date
11-09-2023
Registration No
17/2023
Registration Date
11-09-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karpagam
Adv. K.Sukumaran,B.Sc.,B.L.,
Minor. Aadhini
Respondent(s)
Anbudoss
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-12-2025 | Arguments |
| 27-11-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary This document contains witness depositions (PW-1 and RW-1) recorded on 26-11-2025 in a maintenance case (MC.17/2023) before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur. The petitioner (wife, aged 29) testified that she was married on 04-06-2021, had a child in 2022, and alleged her husband (respondent, aged 35) subjected her to cruelty and subsequently abandoned her. The respondent's cross-examination revealed contradictions in her testimony regarding circumstances of leaving the home. The respondent denied having sufficient means to provide maintenance, claiming limited income from agriculture and employment. Both parties' witness examinations have been completed and their testimonies recorded by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This document contains witness depositions (PW-1 and RW-1) recorded on 26-11-2025 in a maintenance case (MC.17/2023) before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur. The petitioner (wife, aged 29) testified that she was married on 04-06-2021, had a child in 2022, and alleged her husband (respondent, aged 35) subjected her to cruelty and subsequently abandoned her. The respondent's cross-examination revealed contradictions in her testimony regarding circumstances of leaving the home. The respondent denied having sufficient means to provide maintenance, claiming limited income from agriculture and employment. Both parties' witness examinations have been completed and their testimonies recorded by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts