Marimuthu vs Kalpana — 462/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 r/w 142. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTJ270008202023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
714/2023
Filing Date
11-08-2023
Registration No
462/2023
Registration Date
11-08-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Marimuthu
Adv. A.K.Selvam,M.A.,B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Kalpana
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 25-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 18-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvidaimaruthur recorded the deposition of witness PW-1 on 03.05.2024 in case STC 462/2023. The witness testified that they received a loan of ₹9,00,000 on 11.10.2022 from the defendant, but when the defendant's bank returned a guarantee letter dated 24.04.2023 for the same amount citing insufficient funds and discrepancies in the defendant's account, the witness filed a criminal complaint against the defendant. Cross-examination of the witness was deferred, and the witness's statement was recorded, typed, read over, and signed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvidaimaruthur recorded the deposition of witness PW-1 on 03.05.2024 in case STC 462/2023. The witness testified that they received a loan of ₹9,00,000 on 11.10.2022 from the defendant, but when the defendant's bank returned a guarantee letter dated 24.04.2023 for the same amount citing insufficient funds and discrepancies in the defendant's account, the witness filed a criminal complaint against the defendant. Cross-examination of the witness was deferred, and the witness's statement was recorded, typed, read over, and signed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts