Balakrishnan vs Balraj Advocate - S.Loganathan. B.A., B.L., — 97/2022

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTJ270005302022

Evidence

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

Filing Number

103/2022

Filing Date

10-10-2022

Registration No

97/2022

Registration Date

10-10-2022

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 27(c)
IA/1/2022 Classification : Injunction Petition Section BalakrishnanBalraj

Petitioner(s)

Balakrishnan

Adv. G.Tamilselvan, B.com.,B.L.,

Respondent(s)

Balraj Advocate - S.Loganathan. B.A., B.L.,

Vimalraj

Adv. L.A.Elangovan. B.A., B.L.,

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimarudur

01-04-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

25-02-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Summary: This is a witness deposition (DW-1) in civil suit O.S.97/2022 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur, dated 25.02.2026. The witness, aged 64, testified regarding documents related to crop insurance payments made in 2018-2019 and 2019-2020, a wife's remittance dated 10.08.2021, and a land deed dated 10.03.2022, all of which were marked as exhibits. The plaintiff's counsel sought dismissal of the case, and cross-examination was adjourned based on the plaintiff's counsel's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a witness deposition (DW-1) in civil suit O.S.97/2022 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur, dated 25.02.2026. The witness, aged 64, testified regarding documents related to crop insurance payments made in 2018-2019 and 2019-2020, a wife's remittance dated 10.08.2021, and a land deed dated 10.03.2022, all of which were marked as exhibits. The plaintiff's counsel sought dismissal of the case, and cross-examination was adjourned based on the plaintiff's counsel's request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvidaimaruthur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case